Prehistory of populist constitutionalism: Difference between revisions

Line 30:
 
==Eleftherios Venizelos==
It has been rightly observed that Greece “''has been recurrently susceptible to populist appeals, the figures of Eleftherios Venizelos and Andreas Papandreou towering over twentieth-century Greek history''”.<ref>Paul Kenny, ''Why Populism?: Political Strategy from Ancient Greece to the Present'', Cambridge University Press, 2023, p. 187.</ref> Venizelos' statesmanship “''could by no stretch of the imagination be equated with the attitude and mentality of latter-day populist politicians''”; however, these politicians “''appear similarly consumed by politics, but lack Venizelos' moral understanding of the character of public life''”.<ref>Paschalis M. Kitromilides, ''Venizelos' Intellectual Projects and Cultural Interests'', in Paschalis M. Kitromilides, ''Eleftherios Venizelos: The Trials of Statesmanship'', Edinburgh University Press, 2006, p. 377.</ref> In this vein, Venizelos can be seen as a principled populist, i.e. as a man who understands that politics is the realm of opinion and not of truth.<ref>Cf. Hannah Arendt, ''Truth and Politics'', in ''Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought'', Penguin, 2006, pp. 223-259.</ref>.<br>
 
Venizelos' populist constitutionalism is vividly illustrated in a debate with Senator Alexandros Mylonas. Mylonas suggested that the opinion of Alexandros Svolos, a prominent constitutional lawyer, outweighed that of a politician; Venizelos strongly disagreed: