Addressees of Horace's Odes: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 134:
☞ Asterie: 3.7 (“''Asterie''”).
☞ Barine: 2.8 (“''Barine''”).
☞ Chloe: 1.23 (“''Chloe''”).
☞ Chloris: 3.15 (“''Chlori''”).
☞ Galatea: 3.27 (“''Galatea''”).
☞ Leuconoe: 1.11 (“''Leuconoe''”).
☞ Ligurinus: 4.1, 4.10 (“''Ligurine''”).<ref>Shorey and Laing, ''op. cit.'', read “''Ligurinum''” in Ode 4.10. I follow the corrections of Lombardo and Corbeill, ''op. cit.''</ref>
☞ Lyce: 3.10, 4.13 (“''Lyce''”).
☞ Lyde: 3.28 (“''Lyde''”).
☞ Lydia: 1.8, 1.13, 1.25, 3.9 (“''Lydia''”).
☞ Neobule’s self: 3.12 (“''Neobule''”).
☞ Phidyle: 3.23 (“''Phidyle''”).
☞ Phyllis: 4.11 (“''Phylli''”).
☞ Postumus: 2.14 (“''Postume, Postume''”).
☞ Pyrrha: 1.5 (“''Pyrrha''”).
☞ Pyrrhus: 3.20 (“''Pyrrhe''”).
☞ Thaliarchus: 1.9 (“''Thaliarche''”).
☞ Tyndaris: 1.17 (“''Tyndari''”).
☞ Xanthias the Phocean: 2.4 (“''Xanthia Phoceu''”).
Line 156 ⟶ 174:
☞ 1.16 (“''matre pulcra filia pulchrior''”).
☞ 2.18 (“''tu''”).<ref>This anonymous addressee is perhaps Maecenas, see R. G. M. Nisbet and M. Hubbard, ''A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book II'', Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978, p. 289-290.</ref>
☞ 1.38, 3.14, 3.19 (“''puer''”).<ref>The ode contains a toast to Lucius Licinius Murena and yet “''in 3.19 none of the characters addressed can be identified with Murena''” (Citroni, ''op. cit.'', p. 73n2).</ref>
☞ 3.24.<ref>The ode is addressed to a “''diatribic ‘you’''” (Citroni, ''op. cit.'', p. 74).</ref>
Line 163 ⟶ 184:
☞ 1.21 (“''tenerae [...] virgines''”, “''pueri''”, “''mares''”).
☞ 1.27, 1.37 (“''sodales''”).
☞ 2.19 (“''posteri''”).
☞ 3.1 (“''virginibus puerisque''”).
☞ 3.6 (“''Romane''”).<ref>Needless to say, “''Romanus''” is here a collective noun.</ref>
☞ 3.14 (“''plebs''”, “''pueri et puellae''”).
Line 172 ⟶ 198:
☞ Bandusia’s fount: 3.13 (“''fons Bandusiae''”).
☞ Lyre: 1.32, 3.11 (“''testudo''”).
☞ Ship: 1.3, 1.14 (“''navis''”).
☞ Tree: 2.13 (“''arbos''”).
☞ Wine-jar: 3.21 (“''testa''”).
| |||